4.6 Article

MAS-NMR investigations of the crystallization behaviour of lithium aluminum silicate (LAS) glasses containing P2O5 and TiO2 nucleants

期刊

JOURNAL OF SOLID STATE CHEMISTRY
卷 183, 期 6, 页码 1416-1422

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jssc.2010.04.011

关键词

Glass; Glass ceramics; Lithium alumino-silicate; MAS-NMR; P2O5; TiO2

资金

  1. FEDER
  2. Region Nord Pas-de-Calais
  3. Ministere de l'Education Nationale de l'Enseignement Supeneur et de la Recherche
  4. CNRS
  5. USTL
  6. DAE
  7. IFCPAR [4008-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lithium aluminum silicate (LAS) glass of composition (mol%) 20.4Li(2)O-4 0Al(2)O(3)-68 6SiO(2)-3 OK2 O-2.6B(2)O(3)-0.5P(2)O(5)-0 9TiO(2) was prepared by melt quenching. The glass was then nucleated and crystallized based on differential thermal analysis (DTA) data and was characterized by (29)S1, P-31, B-11 and (27)AI MAS-NMR. XRD and Si-29 NMR showed that lithium metasilicate (Li2SiO3) is the first phase to c form followed by cnstobalite (SiO2) and lithium disilicate (Li2Si2O5) Si-29 MAS-NMR revealed a change in the network structure already for the glasses nucleated at 550 degrees C. Since crystalline Li3PO4, as observed by P-31 MAS-NMR, forms concurrently with the silicate phases, we conclude that crystalline Li3PO4 does not act as a nucleating agent for lithium silicate phases. Moreover, P-31 NMR indicates the formation of M-PO4 (M=B, Al or Ti) complexes The presence of BO3 and BO4 structural units in all the glass/glassceramic samples is revealed through B-11 MAS-NMR. B remains in the residual glass and the crystallization of silicate phases causes a reduction in the number of alkali ions available for charge compensation As a result, the number of trigonally coordinated B (BO3) increases at the expense of tetrahedrally coordinated B (BO4) The (27)AI MAS-NMR spectra indicate the presence of tetrahedrally coordinated Al species, which are only slightly perturbed by the crystallization (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据