4.7 Article

Inhibition of root meristem growth by cadmium involves nitric oxide-mediated repression of auxin accumulation and signalling in Arabidopsis

期刊

PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT
卷 39, 期 1, 页码 120-135

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/pce.12597

关键词

AXR3/IAA 17; Cd stress

资金

  1. Hainan Major Research Project for Science and Technology [ZDZX2013023]
  2. Comprehensive Strength Promotion Project for Midwest Universities [ZXBJH-xk001]
  3. Hainan University [kyqd1437]
  4. Hainan Natural Science Foundation [20153092]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The root is the first plant organ to get in contact with the toxin cadmium (Cd), which is a widespread soil contaminant. Cd inhibits the growth of the primary root, but the mechanisms underlying this inhibition remain elusive. In this study, we used physiological, pharmacological and genetic approaches to investigate the roles of nitric oxide (NO) and auxin in Cd-mediated inhibition of Arahidopsis thaliana root meristem growth. Our study demonstrated that in the fist 12 h of exposure, Cd inhibits primary root elongation through a decrease in the sizes of both the elongation and meristematic zones. Following Cd exposure, a decrease in auxin levels is associated with reduced PIN1/317 protein accumulation, but not with reduced PIN1/3/7 transcript levels. Additionally. Cd stabilized AXR3/IAA17 protein to repress auxin signalling in this Cd-mediated process. Furthermore, decreasing Cd-induced NO accumulation with either NO-specific scavenger 2-(4carboxyphenyl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethylfinidazoline-1-oxyl-3-oxide (cPTIO) or NO synthase inhibitor N'-nitro-L-Arg-methylester (t-NAME) compromised the Cd-mediated inhibition of root meristem development, reduction in auxin and PIN1/317 accumulation, as well as stabilization of AXR3/IAA17, indicating that NO participates in Cd-mediated inhibition of root meristem growth. Taken together, our data suggest that Cd inhibits root meristem growth by NO-mediated repression of auxin accumulation and signalling in Arabidopsis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据