4.8 Article

GLABRA2 Directly Suppresses Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factor Genes with Diverse Functions in Root Hair Development

期刊

PLANT CELL
卷 27, 期 10, 页码 2894-2906

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1105/tpc.15.00607

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Transgenic Research Project [2013ZX08009-002]
  2. Japanese Society of Promotion of Science [NSFC-JSPS 31211140041]
  3. Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science [26891013]
  4. 111 Project
  5. Natural Science Foundation of China
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26650096, 25440133, 26891013] Funding Source: KAKEN
  7. Medical Research Council [MC_U105184308] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. MRC [MC_U105184308] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Arabidopsis thaliana GLABRA2 (GL2) gene encodes a transcription factor involved in the cell differentiation of various epidermal tissues. During root hair pattern formation, GL2 suppresses root hair development in non-hair cells, acting as a node between the gene regulatory networks for cell fate determination and cell differentiation. Despite the importance of GL2 function, its molecular basis remains obscure because the GL2 target genes leading to the network for cell differentiation are unknown. We identified five basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factor genes (ROOT HAIR DEFECTIVE6 [RHD6], RHD6-LIKE1 [RSL1], RSL2, Lj-RHL1-LIKE1 [LRL1], and LRL2) as GL2 direct targets using transcriptional and posttranslational induction systems. Chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis confirmed GL2 binding to upstream regions of these genes in planta. Reporter gene analyses showed that these genes are expressed in various stages of root hair development and are suppressed by GL2 in non-hair cells. GL2 promoter-driven GFP fusions of LRL1 and LRL2, but not those of the other bHLH proteins, conferred root hair development on non-hair cells. These results indicate that GL2 directly suppresses bHLH genes with diverse functions in root hair development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据