4.2 Article

Performances of different diagnostic tests for feline infectious peritonitis in challenging clinical cases

期刊

JOURNAL OF SMALL ANIMAL PRACTICE
卷 52, 期 3, 页码 152-157

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-5827.2011.01042.x

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Methods: Twelve cases (four without FIP, eight with FIP) were retrospectively studied. Clinical findings, serum protein electrophoresis (SPE), analysis of the effusions (AE), antifeline coronavirus serology, serum concentration of alpha 1-acid glycoprotein (AGP) and histopathology were classified as consistent, doubtful or non-consistent with FIP. Sensitivity, specificity and concordance (kappa) with the final diagnosis were calculated. Results: Concordance was absent for serology (kappa=-0 center dot 08) and AE (kappa=-0 center dot 52), poor for histopathology (kappa=0 center dot 09), fair for SPE (kappa=0 center dot 25) and perfect for AGP (kappa=1 center dot 00). Sensitivity was high for AGP (100%) and low for AE (50%), SPE (37 center dot 5%) and histopathology (37 center dot 5%). Specificity was high for AGP or histopathology (100%) and low for SPE (50%) and AE (0%). Clinical Significance: IHC must always be performed to confirm FIP. If this is not possible, when histopathology is controversial, elevated AGP concentrations may support the diagnosis of FIP.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据