4.5 Article

Acute exposure to evening blue-enriched light impacts on human sleep

期刊

JOURNAL OF SLEEP RESEARCH
卷 22, 期 5, 页码 573-580

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jsr.12050

关键词

non-image-forming system; non-rapid eye movement sleep; polychromatic blue light; sleep electroencephalographic power density; slow wave activity

资金

  1. Swiss Federal Office for Public Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Light in the short wavelength range (blue light: 446-483nm) elicits direct effects on human melatonin secretion, alertness and cognitive performance via non-image-forming photoreceptors. However, the impact of blue-enriched polychromatic light on human sleep architecture and sleep electroencephalographic activity remains fairly unknown. In this study we investigated sleep structure and sleep electroencephalographic characteristics of 30 healthy young participants (16 men, 14 women; age range 20-31years) following 2h of evening light exposure to polychromatic light at 6500K, 2500K and 3000K. Sleep structure across the first three non-rapid eye movement non-rapid eye movement - rapid eye movement sleep cycles did not differ significantly with respect to the light conditions. All-night non-rapid eye movement sleep electroencephalographic power density indicated that exposure to light at 6500K resulted in a tendency for less frontal non-rapid eye movement electroencephalographic power density, compared to light at 2500K and 3000K. The dynamics of non-rapid eye movement electroencephalographic slow wave activity (2.0-4.0Hz), a functional index of homeostatic sleep pressure, were such that slow wave activity was reduced significantly during the first sleep cycle after light at 6500K compared to light at 2500K and 3000K, particularly in the frontal derivation. Our data suggest that exposure to blue-enriched polychromatic light at relatively low room light levels impacts upon homeostatic sleep regulation, as indexed by reduction in frontal slow wave activity during the first non-rapid eye movement episode.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据