4.7 Article

FT overexpression induces precocious flowering and normal reproductive development in Eucalyptus

期刊

PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY JOURNAL
卷 14, 期 2, 页码 808-819

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/pbi.12431

关键词

Eucalypts; breeding; transgenic; forest biotechnology; Flowering Locus T; genetic engineering

资金

  1. Oregon State University
  2. Tree Biosafety and Genomics Research Cooperative at OSU
  3. Div Of Industrial Innovation & Partnersh
  4. Directorate For Engineering [1238305] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Eucalyptus trees are among the most important species for industrial forestry worldwide. However, as with most forest trees, flowering does not begin for one to several years after planting which can limit the rate of conventional and molecular breeding. To speed flowering, we transformed a Eucalyptus grandisxurophylla hybrid (SP7) with a variety of constructs that enable overexpression of FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT). We found that FT expression led to very early flowering, with events showing floral buds within 1-5months of transplanting to the glasshouse. The most rapid flowering was observed when the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter was used to drive the Arabidopsis thaliana FT gene (AtFT). Early flowering was also observed with AtFT overexpression from a 409S ubiquitin promoter and under heat induction conditions with Populus trichocarpa FT1 (PtFT1) under control of a heat-shock promoter. Early flowering trees grew robustly, but exhibited a highly branched phenotype compared to the strong apical dominance of nonflowering transgenic and control trees. AtFT-induced flowers were morphologically normal and produced viable pollen grains and viable self- and cross-pollinated seeds. Many self-seedlings inherited AtFT and flowered early. FT overexpression-induced flowering in Eucalyptus may be a valuable means for accelerating breeding and genetic studies as the transgene can be easily segregated away in progeny, restoring normal growth and form.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据