4.3 Article

Alterations in function after rotator cuff tears in an animal model

期刊

JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY
卷 18, 期 2, 页码 296-304

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2008.10.008

关键词

Animal model; biomechanics; supraspinatus tendon; infraspinatus tendon; subscapularis tendon; shoulder; rotator cuff; tendon injury

资金

  1. NIAMS NIH HHS [P30 AR050950-03, P30 AR050950, P30 AR050950-02, R01 AR051000-03, R01 AR051000] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hypothesis: This study utilized an animal model of multiple rotator cuff tendon tears to investigate alterations in the remaining (intact) rotator cuff tendon mechanical properties. Materials and methods: Twenty-four rats served as uninjured controls, while seventy-two rats were divided among the tendon detachment groups (supraspinatus tendon detachment, supraspinatus+infraspinatus tendon detachment, supraspinatus+subscapularis tendon detachment). Mechanical testing was performed at 4 and 8 weeks post-injury. Results: The remaining (intact) rotator cuff tendons had decreased mechanical properties in the presence of rotator cuff tears. Remaining (intact) subscapularis and infraspinatus tendon cross-sectional area increased, while tendon modulus decreased after both one and two tendon tears. Additionally, the remaining (intact) tendon cross-sectional areas continued to increase with time post-injury. Discussion: This is the first animal study to examine the normal rotator cuff tendons and the remaining (intact) rotator cuff tendons after tendon detachment or tears. We found that that the remaining (intact) rotator cuff tendons have altered mechanical properties with different tear sizes. These alterations could potentially lead to further tendon damage and tear progression. Conclusion: Results demonstrate not only differences in the uninjured rotator cuff tendons, but also that tears of one or two tendons affect the remaining (intact) tendons. Level of evidence: Level 1; Controlled laboratory study. (c) 2009 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据