4.1 Article

EFFECT OF pH ON GENE EXPRESSION AND THERMAL TOLERANCE OF EARLY LIFE HISTORY STAGES OF RED ABALONE (HALIOTIS RUFESCENS)

期刊

JOURNAL OF SHELLFISH RESEARCH
卷 29, 期 2, 页码 429-439

出版社

NATL SHELLFISHERIES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2983/035.029.0220

关键词

abalone; ocean acidification; early development; pH; Haliotis; climate change; gene expression

资金

  1. University of California Marine Council
  2. Coastal Environmental Quality Initiative
  3. U.S. National Science Foundation [OCE-0425107]
  4. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
  5. David and Lucile Packard Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A growing body of research on calcifying marine invertebrates suggests that ocean acidification will have deleterious effects on development and various physiological processes in these organisms. In laboratory experiments designed to mimic seawater chemistry in future oceans, we examined the effect of pH reduction, driven by the carbon dioxide (CO2) acidification of seawater, on larvae of the red abalone, Haliotis rufescens. Following development under CO2-acidified conditions, we measured 2 indicators of physiological response to low pH in 4 stages of larval development: (1) tolerance of acute thermal challenges and (2) quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction-determined expression of 2 genes involved in shell formation (engrailed and ap24). The results showed that low pH (pH 7.87 vs. pH 8.05 for control treatments) had a significant effect and decreased larval thermal tolerance for some developmental stages (pretorsion and late veliger), but not for others (posttorsion and premetamorphic veligers). In contrast to the thermal tolerance data, decreased pH did not affect the expression pattern of the 2 shell formation genes in any of the abalone larval stages. The results indicate larval stages were differentially sensitive to low pH conditions and this variability may play into the resilience of individual species to withstand environmental change in the longer term.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据