4.5 Article

Gas chromatography with mass spectrometry analysis of phosphoserine, phosphoethanolamine, phosphoglycerol, and phosphate

期刊

JOURNAL OF SEPARATION SCIENCE
卷 38, 期 1, 页码 67-72

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.201400657

关键词

Gas chromatography with mass spectrometry; Phosphoethanolamine; Phospholipids; Phosphoserine; Trimethylsilylation

资金

  1. Department of Analytical Chemistry of the Faculty of Science of Charles University in Prague [SVV260084, APVV-0840-11, APVV-0416-10, APVV-0061-11, APVV-0286-12]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new, rapid, sensitive, robust, and reliable method has been developed for the qualitative analysis of phosphoserine, phosphoethanolamine, phosphoglycerol, and phosphate using gas chromatography with mass spectrometry and two-step trimethylsilylation. The method employs hexamethyldisilazane for silylation of the phosphate and hydroxyl groups in the first phase and bis(trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide for silylation of the less-reactive amino groups in the second phase. This order is of key importance for the method because of the different reactivities of the two reagents and the mechanism of derivatization of the active groups of the analytes. Trimethylsilylated derivatives of the analytes were identified on the basis of their retention times and mass spectra. The probable structures of the major fragments were identified in the spectra of the trimethylsilylated derivatives and characteristic m/z fragments were selected for each analyte. Fragments with m/z 73 and 299 occurred in the spectra of all the analytes. The characteristic retention data were employed to calculate the retention indices of the individual silylated phosphorylated substances in the hydrocarbon range C-12-C-19 for the DB-5ms column. The method was employed to measure the polar fraction of the hydrolysate of the cytoplasmic membrane of Bacillus subtilis. The detection limits vary between 5 mu g/mL (trimethylsilylated phosphate) and 72 mu g/mL (trimethylsilylated phosphoethanolamine).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据