4.5 Article

Ultrasound-assisted dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction combined with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry in negative chemical ionization mode for the determination of polybrominated diphenyl ethers in water

期刊

JOURNAL OF SEPARATION SCIENCE
卷 36, 期 7, 页码 1263-1269

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.201201049

关键词

GC-MS; Polybrominated diphenyl ethers; UA-DLLME; Water

资金

  1. National Key Project for Basic Research of China [2012CB417004]
  2. National Scientific Foundation of China [41171390]
  3. Research Equipment Development Project of Chinese Academy of Sciences [YZ201105]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A simple and economical method for the determination of eight polybrominated diphenyl ethers (BDE-28, 47, 99, 100,153,154,183, and 209) in water was developed. This method involves the use of ultrasound-assisted dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction combined with GC-MS in negative chemical ionization mode. Various parameters affecting the extraction efficiency, including the type and volume of extraction and dispersive solvents, salt concentration, extraction time, and ultrasonic time, were investigated. A volume of 1.0 mL of acetone (dispersive solvent) containing 10 mu L tetrachloroethylene (extraction solvent) was injected into 5.0 mL of water samples and then emulsified by ultrasound for 2.0 min to produce the cloudy solution. Under the optimal condition, the enrichment factors for the eight PBDEs were varied from 845- to 1050-folds. Good linearity was observed in the range of 1.0-200 ng L-1 for BDE-28, 47, 99, and 100; 5.0-200 ng L-1 for BDE-153, 154, and 183; and 5.0-500 ng L-1 for BDE-209. The RSD values were in the range of 2.5-8.4% (n = 5) and the LODs ranged from 0.40 to 2.15 ng L-1 (S/N = 3). The developed method was applied for the determination of eight BPDEs in the river and lake water samples, and the mean recoveries at spiking levels of 5.0 and 50.0 ng L-1 were in the range of 70.6-105.1%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据