4.5 Article

Speciation, adsorption and determination of chromium(III) and chromium(VI) on a mesoporous surface imprinted polymer adsorbent by combining inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry and UV spectrophotometry

期刊

JOURNAL OF SEPARATION SCIENCE
卷 36, 期 24, 页码 3949-3957

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.201300972

关键词

Chromium; Mesoporous materials; Molecularly imprinted polymers; Selectivity; Speciation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21207051, 21206059]
  2. Ph.D. Programs Foundation of Ministry of Education of China [20123227120015]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2012M511220, 2013M531284]
  4. Ph.D. Innovation Programs Foundation of Jiangsu Province [CXZZ13_0680]
  5. Society Development Fund of Zhenjiang [SH2012021]
  6. Programs of Senior Talent Foundation of Jiangsu University [11JDG125]
  7. Jiangsu University [201310299055W]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the present study, a Cr(III)-imprinted polymer (Cr(III)-IIP) was prepared by an easy one-step sol-gel reaction with a surface imprinting technique on the support of silica mesoporous material. A new SPE method for the speciation, separation, preconcentration, and determination of Cr(III) and Cr(VI) by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry and UV on the mesoporous-imprinted polymer adsorbent was developed. The structure of the imprinted polymer was characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, X-ray powder diffraction, transmission electron microscopy, and nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms. The adsorption kinetics, thermodynamics behavior, and recognition ability toward Cr(III) on Cr(III)-IIP and nonimprinted polymer were compared. The results showed that Cr(III)-IIP had higher selectivity and nearly a two times larger Langmuir adsorption capacity (38.50 mg/g) than that of NIP. The proposed method has been successfully applied in the determination and speciation of chromium in natural water samples with satisfactory results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据