4.7 Article

Dynamics of soil aggregate-associated organic carbon along an afforestation chronosequence

期刊

PLANT AND SOIL
卷 391, 期 1-2, 页码 237-251

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-015-2415-7

关键词

Abandoned farmland; Afforestation age; Chinese pine; OC accumulation; OC turnover; Soil aggregate; Soil depth

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41471244, 41271315]
  2. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-13-0487]
  3. Northwest AF University [2014YQ007]
  4. Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences
  5. Ministry of Water Resources [A315021381]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims The objectives of this study were to determine the dynamics of aggregate-associated organic carbon (OC) along an afforestation chronosequence on abandoned farmland of China, and to examine the contributions of changes in aggregate-associated OC to changes in total soil OC. Methods We investigated the dynamics of OC associated with aggregates along an afforestation chronosequence. Water-stable aggregates were isolated, and the OC concentrations in total soil and the aggregates were measured. Results Averaged across the entire chronosequence, afforestation led to 116, 128 and 108% average increases in OC concentrations in macroaggregates, microaggregates and the <0.053 mm size class, respectively, in the top 20 cm of soil. The OC stocks in macroaggregates increased by averages of 651 and 473 % at 0-10 and 10-20 cm depths, respectively, mostly within the first 24 years. The OC stocks in microaggregates decreased during the first 35 years and then increased during 48200 years of afforestation. Averaged across the entire chronosequence, the increases in OC stocks in macroaggregates accounted for 83 and 100 % of the total increase in OC stocks in soils at 0-10 and 10-20 cm depths, respectively. Conclusion Our results indicated that the accumulation of OC in soils after afforestation on abandoned farmland was mainly due to the accumulation of OC in macroaggregates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据