4.7 Article

Changes in root morphology and physiology to limited phosphorus and moisture in a locally-selected cultivar and an introduced cultivar of Medicago sativa L. growing in alkaline soil

期刊

PLANT AND SOIL
卷 392, 期 1-2, 页码 215-226

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-015-2454-0

关键词

Alfalfa; Carboxylates; Drought; Lucerne; Specific root length; Total root length

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [31300328, 31422011]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities [lzujbky-2013-97, 860974]
  3. '111' Programme [B07051]
  4. Program for Innovative Research Teams of Ministry of Education of China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The productivity of lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) is limited by phosphorus (P) deficiency and drought on alkaline soils in northwest China. The aim of this study was to identify the morphological and physiological responses of roots to P- and moisture-limited conditions in an alkaline soil. A pot experiment compared the growth and root characteristics of an introduced (Arkaxiya) and a locally-selected (Longzhong) lucerne cultivar grown in alkaline soil, with an initial available soil P of 6.9 mu g P g(-1) dry soil and a pH of 8.3, with four applied-P rates (0, 4.2, 8.4 and 16.8 mu g P g(-1) dry soil) and three soil moisture treatments [maintained at 75-90 %, 45-55 % and 30-35 % of field capacity (FC)]. At high soil P and high soil water content (SWC), high total root length contributed to high P uptake, high P-use efficiency, and greater plant growth in Arkaxiya compared to Longzhong. However at low SWC, Longzhong had a higher specific root length (thinner roots) and higher total root length than Arkaxiya. At low SWC greater biomass was allocated to roots, at low P-supply the specific root length increased, while the combination of low soil P and low SWC induced greater release of rhizosphere carboxylates. The results suggest that the introduced cultivar has traits that will benefit lucerne production in all but the driest and low-phosphate alkaline soils.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据