4.5 Article

UPLC-MS/MS performing pharmacokinetic and biodistribution studies of rhein

期刊

JOURNAL OF SEPARATION SCIENCE
卷 35, 期 16, 页码 2063-2068

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.201200378

关键词

Biodistribution; Pharmacokinetics; Rhein; UPLC-MS; MS; WinNonlin

资金

  1. Key Program of the Natural Science Foundation of the State [90709019]
  2. National Key Program on the Subject of Drug Innovation [2009ZX09502-005]
  3. National Specific Program on the Subject of Public Welfare [200807014]
  4. National Program for Key Basic Research Projects in China [2005CB523406]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rhein, an important constituent of Radix et Rhizoma Rhei, has been used to alleviate liver and kidney damage. In this work, plasma pharmacokinetic and biodistribution characteristics of rhein after oral administration was investigated using a rapid and sensitive ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem high-definition mass spectrometry (UPLCMS/MS) method. Mass spectrometry was performed on a Waters Micromass high-definition technology with an electrospray ionization source in positive ion mode. Biosamples were prepared using methanolic precipitation and the separation of rhein was achieved on a UPLC HSS T3 column by linear gradient elution and the total run time was only 4.70 min. Data were analyzed and estimated by compartmental methods using WinNonlin Professional version 5.1. Mean pharmacokinetic parameters following single-dose administration of rhein was consistent with a two-compartmental open model. It was found that rhein was distributed and eliminated rapidly in rats and the biodistribution showed the higher levels were in liver, spleen, kidney, heart, lung and the lower level observed in the muscle, adrenal, and thyroid. It was not discovered in brain and showed that rhein could not cross the bloodbrain barrier. Our developed UPLCMS/MS approach was capable of providing complete pharmacokinetic and biodistribution parameters for rhein when administered orally.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据