4.5 Article

Hollow-fiber liquid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry of barbiturates in whole blood samples

期刊

JOURNAL OF SEPARATION SCIENCE
卷 35, 期 23, 页码 3361-3368

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.201200444

关键词

Barbiturates; GC-MS; Liquid-phase microextraction; Whole blood

资金

  1. Faculty of Medicine - University of Sao Paulo [LIM 40/HC-FMUSP]
  2. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [2009/08314-9]
  3. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) [470643/2009-9]
  4. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [09/08314-9] Funding Source: FAPESP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Here, we present a method for measuring barbiturates (butalbital, secobarbital, pentobarbital, and phenobarbital) in whole blood samples. To accomplish these measurements, analytes were extracted by means of hollow-fiber liquid-phase microextraction in the three-phase mode. Hollow-fiber pores were filled with decanol, and a solution of sodium hydroxide (pH 13) was introduced into the lumen of the fiber (acceptor phase). The fiber was submersed in the acidified blood sample, and the system was subjected to an ultrasonic bath. After a 5 min extraction, the acceptor phase was withdrawn from the fiber and dried under a nitrogen stream. The residue was reconstituted with ethyl acetate and trimethylanilinium hydroxide. An aliquot of 1.0 mu L of this solution was injected into the gas chromatograph/mass spectrometer, with the derivatization reaction occurring in the hot injector port (flash methylation). The method proved to be simple and rapid, and only a small amount of organic solvent (decanol) was needed for extraction. The detection limit was 0.5 mu g/mL for all the analyzed barbiturates. The calibration curves were linear over the specified range (1.0 to 10.0 mu g/mL). This method was successfully applied to postmortem samples (heart blood and femoral blood) collected from three deceased persons previously exposed to barbiturates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据