4.7 Article

Phosphorus speciation and micro-scale spatial distribution in North-American temperate agricultural soils from micro X-ray fluorescence and X-ray absorption near-edge spectroscopy

期刊

PLANT AND SOIL
卷 401, 期 1-2, 页码 7-22

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-015-2494-5

关键词

Phosphorus (P); Speciation; Distribution; Agricultural soil; Micro-X-ray fluorescence (mu-XRF); X-ray absorption near edge structure (XANES)

资金

  1. Labex OSUG (Investissements d'avenir) [-ANR10 LABX56]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Aims Phosphorus (P) is an essential nutrient for plants but its low availability often necessitates amendments for agronomical issues. Objectives were to determine P spatial distribution and speciation that remain poorly understood in cultivated soils. Methods Aquic Argiudoll soil samples developed on a calcareous loam glacial till were collected from experimental plots submitted to contrasting crop rotations and amendments. Micro-X-ray fluorescence (mu-XRF) maps were collected on undisturbed samples. X-ray absorption near edge structure (XANES) spectra were collected on bulk samples and on fractions thereof, and on points of interests selected from mu-XRF maps. Results were compared with chemical analyses and extraction techniques results. Results Chemical analyses show variations in total and exchangeable P contents depending on the samples but no significant difference is observed in terms of P distribution and speciation. P distribution is dominated by a low-concentration diffuse background with a minor contribution from minute hot spots. P speciation is dominated by phosphate groups bound to clay-humic complexes. No modification of P distribution and speciation is observed close to roots. Conclusions This study evidenced minor effect of cropping and fertilizing practices on P speciation in cultivated soils. Despite analytical challenges, the combined use of mu-XRF and XANES provides relevant information on P speciation in heterogeneous soil media.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据