4.5 Article

Application of liquid-liquid-liquid microextraction and high-performance liquid chromatography for the determination of alkylphenols and bisphenol-A in water

期刊

JOURNAL OF SEPARATION SCIENCE
卷 34, 期 4, 页码 428-435

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.201000727

关键词

Alkylphenols; Bisphenol-A; Fluorescence detector; High-performance liquid chromatography; Liquid-liquid-liquid microextraction

资金

  1. National Science Council of the Republic of China, Taiwan [NSC 96-2113-M-007-03-MY3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A method termed liquid-liquid-liquid microextraction (LLLME) was utilized to extract 4-t-butylphenol, 4-t-octylphenol, 4-n-nonylphenol, and bisphenol-A from water. The extracted target analytes were separated and quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography using a fluorescence detector. In LLLME, the donor phase (i.e. water sample) was made weakly acidic by adding monobasic potassium phosphate (KH(2)PO(4)); the organic phase adopted was 4-chlorotoluene; the acceptor phase (i.e. enriched extract) was 0.2 M tetraethylammonium hydroxide dissolved in ethylene glycol. This study solves a problem associated with the surface activity of long-chain alkylphenolate ions, permitting LLLME to extract long-chain alkylphenols. Experimental conditions such as acceptor phase composition, organic phase identity, acceptor phase volume, sample agitation, extraction time, and salt addition were optimized. The relative standard deviation (RSD, 2.0-5.8%), coefficient of determination (r(2) 0.9977-0.9999), and detection limit (0.017-0.0048 ng/mL) of the proposed method were achieved under the selected optimized conditions. The method was successfully applied to analyses of lake and tap water samples, and the relative recoveries of target analytes from the spiked lake and tap water samples were 92.8-106.3 and 93.6-105.6%, respectively. The results obtained with the proposed method confirm this microextraction technique to be reliable for the monitoring of alkylphenols and bisphenol-A in water samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据