4.7 Article

Tomato Glutamate Decarboxylase Genes SlGAD2 and SlGAD3 Play Key Roles in Regulating gamma-Aminobutyric Acid Levels in Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)

期刊

PLANT AND CELL PHYSIOLOGY
卷 56, 期 8, 页码 1533-1545

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/pcp/pcv075

关键词

Fruit; GABA; GAD; Molecular breeding; RNAi; Tomato

资金

  1. Japan-France Joint Laboratory Project
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japan
  3. Research and Development Program for New Bio-industry Initiatives, Bio-oriented Technology Research Advancement Institution (BRAIN)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) can accumulate relatively high levels of g-aminobutyric acid (GABA) during fruit development. However, the molecular mechanism underlying GABA accumulation and its physiological function in tomato fruits remain elusive. We previously identified three tomato genes (SlGAD1, SlGAD2 and SlGAD3) encoding glutamate decarboxylase (GAD), likely the key enzyme for GABA biosynthesis in tomato fruits. In this study, we generated transgenic tomato plants in which each SlGAD was suppressed and those in which all three SlGADs were simultaneously suppressed. A significant decrease in GABA levels, i.e. 50-81% compared with wild-type (WT) levels, was observed in mature green (MG) fruits of the SlGAD2-suppressed lines, while a more drastic reduction (up to < 10% of WT levels) was observed in the SlGAD3- and triple SlGAD-suppressed lines. These findings suggest that both SlGAD2 and SlGAD3 expression are crucial for GABA biosynthesis in tomato fruits. The importance of SlGAD3 expression was also confirmed by generating transgenic tomato plants that over-expressed SlGAD3. The MG and red fruits of the over-expressing transgenic lines contained higher levels of GABA (2.7- to 5.2-fold) than those of the WT. We also determined that strong down-regulation of the SlGADs had little effect on overall plant growth, fruit development or primary fruit metabolism under normal growth conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据