4.5 Article

Multi-residue method for the analysis of pharmaceutical compounds in sewage sludge, compost and sediments by sonication-assisted extraction and LC determination

期刊

JOURNAL OF SEPARATION SCIENCE
卷 33, 期 12, 页码 1760-1766

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.200900873

关键词

Compost; HPLC; Pharmaceutically active compound; Sediment; Sludge

资金

  1. Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia, Spain [CGL2007-62281]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A method for the simultaneous determination of 16 pharmaceutical compounds in three types of sewage sludge (primary, secondary and anaerobically digested dehydrated sludge), compost and sediment samples is described. Pharmaceutical compounds evaluated were nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (acetaminophen, diclofenac, ibuprofen, ketoprofen, naproxen and salicylic acid), antibiotics (sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim), an anti-epileptic drug (carbamazepine), a beta-blocker (propranolol), a nervous stimulant (caffeine), estrogens (17 alpha-ethinylestradiol, 17 beta-estradiol, estriol and estrone) and lipid regulators (clofibric acid, metabolite of clofibrate and gemfibrozil). The method is based on the ultrasonic-assisted extraction, clean-up by SPE and analytical determination by HPLC with diode array and fluorescence detectors. The best extraction recoveries were achieved in a three-step extraction procedure with methanol and acetone as extraction solvents. Extraction recoveries of several pharmaceutical compounds as caffeine were highly dependent on the type of sample evaluated. The applicability of the method was tested by analyzing primary, secondary and anaerobically digested dehydrated sludge, compost and sediment samples from Seville (Southern Spain). Ten of the sixteen pharmaceutical compounds were detected in sludge samples and five in compost and sediment samples. The highest concentration levels were recorded for ibuprofen in sewage samples, whereas salicylic acid and 17 alpha-ethinylestradiol were detected in all of the samples analyzed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据