4.7 Article

Gibberellin Promotes Shoot Branching in the Perennial Woody Plant Jatropha curcas

期刊

PLANT AND CELL PHYSIOLOGY
卷 56, 期 8, 页码 1655-1666

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/pcp/pcv089

关键词

Axillary bud; Bud outgrowth; Cytokinin; Gibberellin; Shoot branching; Strigolactone

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31370595]
  2. Top Science and Technology Talents Scheme of Yunnan Province [2009CI123]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Yunnan Province [2011FA034]
  4. CAS 135 Program [XTBG-T02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Strigolactone (SL), auxin and cytokinin (CK) interact to regulate shoot branching. CK has long been considered to be the only key phytohormone to promote lateral bud outgrowth. Here we report that gibberellin also acts as a positive regulator in the control of shoot branching in the woody plant Jatropha curcas. We show that gibberellin and CK synergistically promote lateral bud outgrowth, and that both hormones influence the expression of putative branching regulators, J. curcas BRANCHED1 and BRANCHED2, which are key transcription factors maintaining bud dormancy. Moreover, treatment with paclobutrazol, an inhibitor of de novo gibberellin biosynthesis, significantly reduced the promotion of bud outgrowth by CK, suggesting that gibberellin is required for CK-mediated axillary bud outgrowth. In addition, SL, a plant hormone involved in the repression of shoot branching, acted antagonistically to both gibberellin and CK in the control of lateral bud outgrowth. Consistent with this, the expression of JcMAX2, a J. curcas homolog of Arabidopsis MORE AXILLARY GROWTH 2 encoding an F-box protein in the SL signaling pathway, was repressed by gibberellin and CK treatment. We also provide physiological evidence that gibberellin also induces shoot branching in many other trees, such as papaya, indicating that a more complicated regulatory network occurs in the control of shoot branching in some perennial woody plants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据