4.2 Article

DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION OF A LEXICON TO DESCRIBE THE FLAVOR OF POMEGRANATE JUICE

期刊

JOURNAL OF SENSORY STUDIES
卷 25, 期 6, 页码 819-837

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-459X.2010.00307.x

关键词

-

资金

  1. Foundation Archimedes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A lexicon for describing the sensory flavor characteristics of pomegranate juices was developed. Thirty-three pomegranate juices, including concentrated products, products from concentrate, and freshly squeezed and pasteurized products, were studied. More than 30 sensory attributes were identified, defined, and referenced by a highly trained descriptive sensory panel. The lexicon that was established includes attributes to describe a range of flavors associated with pomegranates, such as brown spice, fermented, molasses, vinegar, wine-like, woody, apple, berry, cranberry, cherry and grape. Generally, pomegranate juice can be described by the flavor characteristics of sour, sweet, musty/earthy, fruity aromatics and an astringent mouthfeel. The flavor characteristics of pomegranate juices are reminiscent of a combination of concord grapes, cranberries, blackberries, cherries, currants and raspberries, but there also are vegetable notes such as beets and carrots. The lexicon provides attribute descriptors, definitions and references that were previously lacking in literature on pomegranates. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS The manufacturing and consumption of pomegranate and pomegranate-based products has increased. Many products use pomegranate as a main flavor component or as an addition to other flavors in juices, yoghurts, jams and supplements. This research provides sensory terms that can be used to describe the flavor characteristics of pomegranate juices. This information is useful to product developers, researchers and technologists in understanding the characteristics of pomegranate flavor and using those attributes to create new products, adapt other products, and study quality-control and shelf-life issues.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据