4.4 Article

Analyzing variations in life-history traits of Pacific salmon in the context of Dynamic Energy Budget (DEB) theory

期刊

JOURNAL OF SEA RESEARCH
卷 66, 期 4, 页码 424-433

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seares.2011.07.005

关键词

Life-history traits variations; Body size scaling relationships; DEB theory; Life cycle model; Salmonids; Oncorhynchus spp.

资金

  1. Instream Flow Assessment Program
  2. Public Interest Energy Research (PIER)
  3. Delta Stewardship Council [U-05-SC-058, NA100AR4320156 (UCSD2011-0163)]
  4. U.S. National Science Foundation [DEB-0717259, EF-0742521]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To determine the response of Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) populations to environmental change, we need to understand impacts on all life stages. However, an integrative and mechanistic approach is particularly challenging for Pacific salmon as they use multiple habitats (river, estuarine and marine) during their life cycle. Here we develop a bioenergetic model that predicts development, growth and reproduction of a Pacific salmon in a dynamic environment, from an egg to a reproducing female, and that links female state to egg traits. This model uses Dynamic Energy Budget (DEB) theory to predict how life history traits vary among five species of Pacific salmon: Pink, Sockeye, Coho, Chum and Chinook. Supplemented with a limited number of assumptions on anadromy and semelparity and external signals for migrations, the model reproduces the qualitative patterns in egg size, fry size and fecundity both at the inter- and intra-species levels. Our results highlight how modeling all life stages within a single framework enables us to better understand complex life-history patterns. Additionally we show that body size scaling relationships implied by DEB theory provide a simple way to transfer model parameters among Pacific salmon species, thus providing a generic approach to study the impact of environmental conditions on the life cycle of Pacific salmon. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据