4.5 Article

Activation of KV7 channels stimulates vasodilatation of human placental chorionic plate arteries

期刊

PLACENTA
卷 36, 期 6, 页码 638-644

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.placenta.2015.03.007

关键词

Placenta; Potassium channel; Human

资金

  1. Action Medical Research Award [TM - RTF1305]
  2. Tommy's the Baby Charity
  3. Action Research Endowment Fund
  4. Manchester Biomedical Research Centre
  5. Greater Manchester Comprehensive Local Research Network
  6. European Commission
  7. European Social Fund
  8. Calabria Region

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Potassium (K+) channels are key regulators of vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) excitability. In systemic small arteries, K(V)7 channel expression/activity has been noted and a role in vascular tone regulation demonstrated. We aimed to demonstrate functional K(V)7 channels in human fetoplacental small arteries. Methods: Human placental chorionic plate arteries (CPAs) were obtained at term. CPA responses to K(V)7 channel modulators was determined by wire myography. Presence of K(V)7 channel mRNA (encoded by KCNQ1-5) and protein expression were assessed by RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry/immunofluorescence, respectively. Results: K(V)7 channel blockade with linopirdine increased CPA basal tone and AVP-induced contraction. Pre-contracted CPAs (AVP; 80 mM K+ depolarization solution) exhibited significant relaxation to flupirtine, retigabine, the acrylamide (S)-1, and (S) BMS-204352, differential activators of K(V)7.1 - K(V)7.5 channels. All CPAs assessed expressed KCNQ1 and KCNQ3-5 mRNA; KCNQ2 was expressed only in a subset of CPAs. K(V)7 protein expression was confirmed in intact CPAs and isolated VSMCs. Discussion: K(V)7 channels are present and active in fetoplacental vessels, contributing to vascular tone regulation in normal pregnancy. Targeting these channels may represent a therapeutic intervention in pregnancies complicated by increased vascular resistance. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据