4.6 Article

Quantifying movement demands of AFL football using GPS tracking

期刊

JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND MEDICINE IN SPORT
卷 13, 期 5, 页码 531-536

出版社

SPORTS MEDICINE AUSTRALIA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2009.09.002

关键词

Global positioning system; Australian football; Movement patterns; Fitness; Exertion index

资金

  1. AFL Research Board

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Global positioning system (GPS) monitoring of movement patterns is widespread in elite football including the Australian Football League (AFL). However documented analysis of this activity is lacking. We quantified the movement patterns of AFL football and differences between nomadic (midfield), forward and defender playing positions, and determined whether the physical demands have increased over a four season period. Selected premiership games were monitored during the 2005 (n = 80 game files), 2006 (n = 244), 2007 (n = 632) and 2008 (n = 793) AFL seasons. Players were fitted with a shoulder harness containing a UPS unit. GPS data were downloaded after games and the following measures extracted: total distance (km), time in various speed zones, maximum speed, number of surges, accelerations, longest continuous efforts and a derived exertion index representing playing intensity. In 2008 nomadic players covered per game 3.4% more total distance (km), had 4.8% less playing time (min), a 17% higher exertion index (per min), and 23% more time running >18 km h(-1) than forwards and defenders (all p < 0.05). Physical demands were substantially higher in the 2008 season compared with 2005: an 8.4% increase in mean speed, a 14% increase in intensity (exertion index) and a 9.0% decrease in playing time (all p < 0.05). Nomadic players in AFL work substantially harder than forwards and defenders in covering more ground and at higher running intensities. Increases in the physical demands of AFL football were evident between 2005 and 2008. The increasing speed of the game has implications for game authorities, players and coaching staff. (C) 2009 Sports Medicine Australia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据