4.6 Article

Match running performance in elite Australian Rules Football

期刊

JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND MEDICINE IN SPORT
卷 13, 期 5, 页码 543-548

出版社

SPORTS MEDICINE AUSTRALIA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2009.09.004

关键词

Match analysis; High-intensity running; Team sport; Intermittent exercise

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is little information describing the match running demands of elite-level Australian Rules Football (AF). The aims of this study were to examine: (1) match running demands; and (2) the influence of periods of increased physical activity on subsequent running performance in the Australian Football League. Time-motion analyses were performed 1-9 times per player from 16 professional AF players from the same club during games in 2005-2007, using portable global positioning systems during 65 matches. Game movements (standing, walking, jogging, running, higher-speed running, and sprinting) and distances (total distance coyered [TD]; low-intensity activity ILIA, distance <14.4 km h(-1)]; and, high-intensity running distance [HIR, distance > 14.4 km h]) were collected. The influence of the first half physical activities on second half activities, and each quarter on the subsequent quarter were analysed. The mean (+/- SD) TD and HIR distance covered during the games were 12,939 +/- 1145 m and 3880 +/- 663 m respectively. There were reductions in TD. in the second (-7.3%), third (-5.5%) and fourth (-10.7%) quarters compared to the first quarter (p < 0.01). The HIR was reduced after the first quarter (p < 0.001). Players that covered larger TD or HIR during the first half or quarter decreased distance in the next half and quarter, respectively (p <0.001). These results show that a reduction in exercise intensity is inevitable during an AF match and that higher intensity activities reduce towards the end of games. High average speed during each half or quarter also affects subsequent running performance in elite-level AF. (C) 2009 Sports Medicine Australia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据