4.6 Article

Association with physical fitness, serum hormones and sleep during a 15-day military field training

期刊

JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND MEDICINE IN SPORT
卷 13, 期 3, 页码 356-359

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2009.04.005

关键词

Military; Hormone; Sleep; Physical fitness

资金

  1. Karelian Brigade
  2. National Defence University of the Finnish Defence Forces

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present study aimed to investigate the association between physical fitness, sleep duration and hormonal responses during a 15-day military field training (MFT). The purpose of MFT was to practice offensive manoeuvres in a countryside area. Nine army officers volunteered to participate, and their daily working routine mainly consisted of tasks in the headquarters that required on-call-duty at all times. Physical fitness and body composition were measured just before MFT. Serum testosterone (TES) and cortisol (COR) concentrations and sex-hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) were measured before MET, as well as 8 and 15 days after the beginning of MFT. Heart rate (HR) was recorded for approximately 24 h on days 8, 11 and 15 of MFT. Based on HR responses, there was no evidence of cardiorespiratory strain, hormonal responses or energy deficit during MET. Although the changes in hormonal concentrations were insignificant, they were well correlated with physical fitness (r = 0.67, p = 0.05). Furthermore, the TES/SHGB ratio decreased by 28% in subjects whose VO(2)max was under 44 ml kg(-1) min(-1). On average, subjects slept for 6.20 h per day, but the sleeping rhythm was disturbed due to military tasks. This diurnal sleeping time was strongly associated with TES/COR ratio (r=0.78, p=0.01). These results indicate that MET causes very individual stress reactions, despite the low levels of physical strain and energy deficit. We therefore concluded that the observed hormonal responses were mainly clue to sleep deprivation and low physical fitness. (C) 2009 Sports Medicine Australia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据