4.2 Article

The incidence and prevalence of acromegaly, a nationwide study from 1955 through 2013

期刊

PITUITARY
卷 18, 期 6, 页码 803-807

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11102-015-0655-4

关键词

Acromegaly; Growth hormone; Pituitary tumor; Hypertension

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context Acromegaly is a rare disease with complications and increased mortality. The incidence and prevalence of acromegaly worldwide is not well known. Objective To gather information on patients diagnosed with acromegly in Iceland over 59 years. Design Information was retrospectively gathered about patients diagnosed with acromegaly from 1955 through2013. Incidence was calculated from the total Icelandic population. Setting/patients Information was gathered from medical records at Landspitali National University Hospital, Iceland, housing the only endocrine department in the country, at the largest hospital outside of Reykjavik (SjA(0)krahA(0)siA degrees a Akureyri, Akureyri Hospital) and the largest private outpatient clinic in Reykjavik, where some of the patients received follow-up care. Further, information on patients were sought from all endocrinologists treating adult patients in Iceland. All patients diagnosed with acromegaly during the study period were included. Results Fifty-two patients (32 men) were diagnosed during the study period. The average age at diagnosis was 44.5 years. Nine patients had died. Symptoms had been present for more than 3 years in most cases. Twenty-five patients had hypertension (48 %). Follow up information was available for 48 patients, 63 % were considered cured after treatment. Conclusions The incidence of acromegaly in Iceland during the study period was much higher than earlier reports have indicated. During the last 9 years of the study 7.7 patients were diagnosed per million per year. At diagnosis, 38 % had developed hypertension and 10 % were diagnosed during follow up. This indicates the importance of endocrine disorders in the aetiology of hypertension.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据