4.5 Article

What Should Be the Primary Target of Treat to Target in Psoriatic Arthritis?

期刊

JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY
卷 46, 期 1, 页码 38-42

出版社

J RHEUMATOL PUBL CO
DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.180267

关键词

PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS; TREAT TO TARGET; OUTCOME MEASURES

资金

  1. Arthritis Research UK [18825]
  2. National Institute for Health Research Clinician Scientist award
  3. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Leeds and Oxford Biomedical Research Centre
  4. Comprehensive Clinical Research Network.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. Recommendations regarding treat to target in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) have stated that the target should be remission or inactive disease. Potential definitions include very low disease activity (VLDA), PsA Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) near remission, Disease Activity Index for PsA (DAPSA) or clinical DAPSA (cDAPSA) remission. Our aim was to investigate the proportion of patients who fulfill these definitions and how much residual active disease remained. Methods. This analysis used 2 datasets: first, trial data from the Tight Control of PsA (TICOPA) study, which included 206 patients with recent-onset (< 2 yrs) PsA receiving standard and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD); and second, an observational clinical dataset from Italy of patients receiving biological DMARD. Proportions achieving each of the 4 potential targets were calculated in each dataset and comparisons between treatment groups were performed in the TICOPA dataset. Levels of residual disease were established for key clinical domains of PsA. Results. All measures could differentiate the TICOPA trial treatment groups (p < 0.03). Lower proportions of patients fulfilled the VLDA criteria compared to DAPSA or cDAPSA remission. PASDAS results were different between the cohorts. Residual active disease was low across all definitions although higher levels were seen in DAPSA and cDAPSA compared to VLDA, particularly for psoriasis. In all measures, the proportion with elevated C-reactive protein was similar and low. Conclusion. VLDA appears the most stringent measure. It ensures that significant active arthritis, enthesitis, and psoriasis are not present, in contrast with DAPSA and PASDAS, in which composite scores can hide active disease in some domains.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据