4.5 Article

American College of Rheumatology Criteria at Inception, and Accrual over 5 Years in the SLICC Inception Cohort

期刊

JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY
卷 41, 期 5, 页码 875-880

出版社

J RHEUMATOL PUBL CO
DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.130704

关键词

SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS; AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RHEUMATOLOGY; CLASSIFICATION CRITERIA; DISEASE PROGRESSION

资金

  1. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0512-10105] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. To determine the frequency of each American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criterion met at time of enrollment, and the increase in each of the criteria over 5 years. Methods. In 2000 the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) recruited an international inception cohort of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE; >= 4 ACR criteria) who were followed at yearly intervals according to a standard protocol. Descriptive statistics were used to assess the total and cumulative number of ACR criteria met at each visit. Regression models were done to compare the increase of individual and cumulative criteria as a function of race/ethnicity group, and sex. Results. In all, 768 patients have been followed for a minimum of 5 years. Overall, 59.1% of the patients had an increase in the number of ACR criteria they met over the 5-year period. The mean number of ACR criteria met at enrollment was 5.04 +/- 1.13 and at year 5 was 6.03 +/- 1.42. At enrollment, nonwhite patients had a higher number of ACR criteria (5.19 +/- 1.23) than white patients. The total number of criteria increased in both white and nonwhite ethnicities, but increased more among whites. Males had a slightly lower number of criteria at enrollment compared to females and males accrued fewer criteria at 5 years. Conclusion. In this international inception cohort of SLE patients with at least 4 ACR criteria at entry, there was an accumulation of ACR criteria over the following 5 years. The distribution of criteria both at inception and over 5 years is affected by sex and ethnicity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据