4.5 Article

Childhood-onset Takayasu Arteritis - Experience from a Tertiary Care Center in South India

期刊

JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY
卷 41, 期 6, 页码 1183-1189

出版社

J RHEUMATOL PUBL CO
DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.131117

关键词

PEDIATRIC; TAKAYASU ARTERITIS; ITAS 2010; INDIA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. To study the clinical profile and outcome of Asian Indian children with childhood-onset Takayasu arteritis (c-TA). Methods. Records were studied of patients with c-TA onset prior to age 16. Disease Extent Index-Takayasu (DEI.TAK), Indian Takayasu Arteritis Score 2010, and Takayasu Arteritis Damage Score (TADS) were calculated retrospectively from electronic records. Cumulative incidence of sustained remission was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier curve. Results. There were 40 patients with c-TA, with median age of onset of 12.5 years (range 1-16) and median diagnostic delay of 11.3 months (range 1-60). The most common presenting features were hypertension, headache, malaise, and fever. Pulseless disease was observed in 25 cases (62.5%). The majority (n = 28) had active disease with raised inflammatory markers, high baseline median DEI.TAK score of 10 (range 3-24), and high median TADS of 7 (range 1-14). Of the 34 patients followed for 21.5 months (range 3-192), remission was attained in 30. However, cumulative sustained remission was achieved in only 29% of them at 5 years. Median period of sustained remission was 22.5 months (95% CI 17.1-26.8). New areas of vessel involvement were observed in 13 patients (38%). Disease progression was arrested in the majority (n = 22, 66%) through aggressive medical management and endovascular intervention. All 11 patients with an increment in TADS of >= 4 during followup had persistently active or relapsing disease. There was a single fatality. Conclusion. Despite aggressive immunosuppression, damage progressed in one-third of patients with c-TA in association with persistent inflammation, warranting surveillance with clinical instruments and followup imaging.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据