4.5 Article

Evidence for Genetic Association and Interaction Between the TYK2 and IRF5 Genes in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

期刊

JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY
卷 36, 期 8, 页码 1631-1638

出版社

J RHEUMATOL PUBL CO
DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.081160

关键词

SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; IRF5; GENETIC INTERACTION; DISEASE SUSCEPTIBILITY; TYK2

资金

  1. Finska Lakaresallskapet
  2. Academy of Finland
  3. Sigrid Juselius Foundation and Helsinki University Central Hospital Research Fund [TYH 2008248]
  4. Helsinki University Research Foundation
  5. Biomedicum Helsinki Foundation
  6. Finnish Union of Experts in Science (TMJ)
  7. Medical Research Fund of Tampere University Hospital (TH)
  8. Swedish Research Council (US-K)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. Several candidate genes have been implicated in susceptibility for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), a complex autoimmune disease, The proposed genes include members of the type I interferon (IFN) pathway and Penes involved in immunological defense functions. Our aim was to systematically replicate 6 such genes, TYK2, IRF5, CTLA4, PDCD1, FCGR2A, and NOD2. Methods. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms in TYK2, IRF5, CTLA4, PDCD1, FCGR2A, and NOD2 were genotyped in 277 SLE patients and 356 healthy controls from Finland, giving a power of 42%-70% for different genes at published allele frequencies. Results. Significant association was seen for rs2304256 (p = 0.0001) and rs12720270 (p = 0.0031) in TYK2 and rs10954213 (p = 0.0043) in IRF5 in our samples, but not for the other genes. We found evidence for genetic interaction (p = 0.014) between rs2304256 in TYK2 and rs10954213 in IRF5, both members of the type I IFN pathway, strengthening the role of the type I IFN pathway in the pathogenesis of SLE. Conclusion. The IFN pathway genes IRF5 and TYK2 may act epistatically in increasing risk for SLE, but our lack of replication does not exclude effects of the other genes studied. (First Release July 1 2009; J Rheumatol 2009;36:1631-8 doi: 10.3899/jrheum.081160)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据