4.5 Article

The Tumor Necrosis Factor-α-blocking Agent Infliximab Inhibits Interleukin 1β (IL-1β) and IL-6 Gene Expression in Human Osteoblastic Cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY
卷 36, 期 8, 页码 1575-1579

出版社

J RHEUMATOL PUBL CO
DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.081321

关键词

ANTI-TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR-alpha; INFLIXIMAB; OSTEOBLASTS; INTERLEUKIN 1 beta; INTERLEUKIN 6; OSTEOPROTEGERIN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) is a proinflammatory cytokine involved in the pathogenesis of several rheumatic diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), associated with systemic bone loss and subchondral bone erosions. TNF-alpha-blocking agents Such as infliximab have been successful in treatment of disease-modifying antirheumatic drug-resistant rheumatic diseases. Infliximab therapy in RA also had beneficial effects on local bone destruction and bone mineral density. We assessed effects of infliximab treatment on the bone tissue compartment and cytokine profile expression in vitro. Methods. Osteoblast-like cells were exposed for 24 h to sera of RA patients collected at baseline and after I month (T1) and 3 years (T2) of infliximab treatment. Total RNA was extracted, and expression of interleukin 1 beta (IL-1 beta), IL-6, and osteoprotegerin (OPG) was measured by RT-PCR. Results. IL-1 beta gene expression was significantly reduced by the T1 serum, and the same decrease was elicited by the T2 serum. IL-6 downregulation was evident with the T2 serum. OPG was unaffected. Conclusion. The finding of downregulation of inflammatory cytokines was interesting, particularly IL-6, which plays a crucial role in arthritis-related bone loss due to its involvement in osteoclast recruitment and activation. These results may represent a biological explanation and a link for the clinical observation of the beneficial effects of anti-TNF-alpha. agents on the progression of rheumatic diseases at the bone level. (First Release July 1 2009; J Rheumatol 2009;36:1575-9 doi: 10.3899/jrheum.081321)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据