4.5 Article

Construct Validity and Reliability of the Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire for Upper Extremity Complaints in Rheumatoid Arthritis

期刊

JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY
卷 35, 期 12, 页码 2334-2338

出版社

J RHEUMATOL PUBL CO
DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.080067

关键词

CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; DISABILITY OF ARM SHOULDER AND HAND; RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS; DASH

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. The Disability of Ann, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire is a tool for measuring physical function and symptoms of the upper extremity. Although widely used, it is not validated for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In this study the DASH was validated for this patient group. Methods. In total, 102 patients participated in this study. For the validation, the questionnaires of the DASH, the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36), and the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scale (ATMS2) were used. Patients were examined clinically before completing the questionnaires. Pain was scored by each patient using a visual analog scale (VAS). The Disease Activity Score (DAS28) was obtained and grip strength was measured. Reliability was tested by a second DASH questionnaire after 2 days. Validity was tested using a Pearson correlation analysis for the relevant domains of the questionnaires and for the clinical aspects. Results. The reliability of the DASH was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.97). Internal consistency was strong (Cronbach's alpha 0.97). Validity was proven with excellent results for Pearson correlation with the relevant domains of the questionnaires: HAQ, r = 0.88; SF-36, r = 0.70; and AIMS2, r = 0.85. The clinical scores had a relatively low correlation with the DASH (DAS28, r = 0.42; and grip strength, r = 0.41-0.48), except for the VAS (r = 0.60-0.65). Conclusion. The DASH is a reliable and valid questionnaire in patients with RA. It can be used as a measurement tool of physical disability of the upper extremity. (First Release Nov 1 2008; J Rheumatol 2008;35:2334-8; doi: 10.3899/jrheum.080067)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据