4.4 Article

Human decidual macrophages suppress IFN-γ production by T cells through costimulatory B7-H1:PD-1 signaling in early pregnancy

期刊

JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE IMMUNOLOGY
卷 100, 期 2, 页码 109-117

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jri.2013.08.001

关键词

Costimulation; B7-H1; Decidual macrophage; Human pregnancy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In human pregnancy, CD14(+) decidual macrophages (DMs) are the dominant professional antigen-presenting cells in the decidua, comprising 20-30% of the local leukocyte population. Although the relevance of DMs to feto-maternal immune tolerance has been described, the molecular mechanisms underlying these functions have not been fully elucidated. B7-H1, a costimulatory ligand in the B7 family, negatively modulates T cell activity by binding to its corresponding receptor, PD-1. The present study aimed to investigate the functional significance of costimulatory interactions between DMs and T cells, with a particular focus on B7-H1:PD-1 signaling. An analysis of the expression profile of B7 ligands on human DMs revealed that B7-H1 was present on DMs isolated from early but not term pregnancies. B7-H1 was not expressed on the peripheral monocytes (PMs) of pregnant women. In response to IFN-gamma, B7-H1 expression was induced on PMs and was enhanced on DMs, suggesting that this cytokine might be a key factor in the control of B7-H1 expression in the decidua. The majority of decidual T cells were noted to exhibit robust expression of PD-1, whereas the expression was limited to a small subpopulation of circulating T cells. Functional assays demonstrated that DMs are able to suppress T cell IFN-gamma production via B7- H1:PD-1 interactions. This suppressive property was not observed for PMs, which lack B7-H1:B7-H1 on DMs may function as a key regulator of local IFN-gamma production and thereby contribute to the development of appropriate maternal immune responses to the fetus in early pregnancy. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据