4.2 Article

Protective Effect of Quercetin on the Reproductive Toxicity of 4-nitrophenol in Diesel Exhaust Particles on Male Embryonic Chickens

期刊

JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT
卷 56, 期 2, 页码 195-199

出版社

SOCIETY REPRODUCTION & DEVELOPMENT-SRD
DOI: 10.1262/jrd.09-074N

关键词

Chicken; 4-Nitrophenol; Oxidative damage; Quercetin; Spermatogonial cells

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [B-18310044, 19.07445]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30871843]
  3. Zhejiang Bureau of Science Technology [2008C22040]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The 4-nitrophenol (PNP) in diesel exhaust particles (DEP) has been identified as a vasodilator and is a known degradation product of the insecticide parathion. In this study, the protective effect of quercetin, a potent oxygen free radical scavenger and metal chelator, against the oxidative damage of PNP on cultured testicular cells was studied in male embryonic chickens. Testicular cells from Day 18 embryos were cultured in serum-free McCoy's 5A medium and challenged with quercetin (1.0 mu g/ml) alone or in combinations with PNP (10(-7)-10(-5) M) for 48 h. The oxidative damage was estimated by measuring cell viability, content of malondialdehyde (MDA), activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and glutathione peroxidation (GSH-Px) activity. The results showed that exposure to PNP (10(-5) M) induced condensed nuclei, vacuolated cytoplasm and a decrease in testicular cell viability and spermatogonial cell number. Exposure to PNP induced lipid peroxidation by elevation of the content of MDA. Exposure to PNP also decreased GSH-Px activity and SOD activity. However, simultaneous supplementation with quercetin restored these parameters to the same levels as the control. Consequently, PNP induced oxidative stress in spermatogonial cells, and dietary quercetin may attenuate the reproductive toxicity of PNP to restore the intracellular antioxidant system in the testicular cells of embryonic chickens.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据