4.5 Article

EFFECTS OF REPETITIVE TRASCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION ON REPETITIVE FACILITATION EXERCISES OF THE HEMIPLEGIC HAND IN CHRONIC STROKE PATIENTS

期刊

JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE
卷 45, 期 9, 页码 843-847

出版社

FOUNDATION REHABILITATION INFORMATION
DOI: 10.2340/16501977-1175

关键词

functional recovery; hemiplegia; repetitive facilitation exercises; repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; stroke

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To investigate whether multiple sessions of 1-Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) facilitates the effect of repetitive facilitation exercises on hemiplegic upper-limb function in chronic stroke patients. Design: Randomized double-blinded crossover study. Patients: Eighteen patients with hemiplegia of the upper limb. Methods: Patients were assigned to 2 groups: a motor-before-sham rTMS group, which performed motor rTMS sessions for 2 weeks followed by sham rTMS sessions for 2 weeks; or a motor-following-sham rTMS group, which performed sham rTMS sessions for 2 weeks followed by motor rTMS sessions for 2 weeks. Patients received 1-.Hz rTMS to the unaffected motor cortex for 4 min and performed repetitive facilitation exercises for 40 min during motor rTMS sessions. The Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) and Simple Test for Evaluating Hand Function were used to evaluate upper-limb function. The Modified Ashworth Scale and F-wave were measured to evaluate spasticity. Results: Motor function improved significantly during the motor, but not sham, rTMS sessions. ARAT score gains were 1.5 (0-4.0) (median, interquartile range) during the motor rTMS session, and 0 (-0.8-1.8) during the sham rTMS session (p=0.04). Spasticity did not significantly change during either session. Conclusion: Multiple sessions of 1-Hz rTMS facilitated the effects of repetitive facilitation exercises in improving motor function of the affected upper limb, but did not change spasticity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据