4.7 Article

Glucosinolate hydrolysis products in the crucifer Barbarea vulgaris include a thiazolidine-2-one from a specific phenolic isomer as well as oxazolidine-2-thiones

期刊

PHYTOCHEMISTRY
卷 115, 期 -, 页码 143-151

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2014.11.002

关键词

Glucosinolate hydrolysis; Oxazolidine-2-thione; 2-Oxazolidinethione; Thiazolidine-2-one; 2-Thiazolidinone; para-Activation; Polymorphism

资金

  1. Torben and Alice Frimodts Fond

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two isomeric phenolic glucosinolates, m- and p-hydroxyl derivatives of epiglucobarbarin [(R)-2-hydroxy-2-phenylethylglucosinolate], co-occur in an eastern chemotype (P-type) of the crucifer Barbarea vulgaris along with epiglucobarbarin itself. Levels of the phenolic derivatives in B. vulgaris were low in summer but higher during fall and winter, allowing isolation of all three glucosinolates. Hydrolysis in vitro, catalyzed by Sinapis alba myrosinase at near neutral pH, resulted in expectable oxazolidine-2-thione type hydrolysis products of epiglucobarbarin and its m-hydroxyl derivative. In contrast, a thiazolidine-2-one type product was formed in vitro from p-hydroxy epiglucobarbarin and characterized by UV, IR, MS/MS and 2D NMR. Maceration of leaf material resulted in disappearance of the glucosinolates and formation of the same oxazolidine-2-thione and thiazolidine-2-one products as found in vitro. The detected amounts were comparable to initial amounts of precursor glucosinolates. The corresponding oxazolidine-2-thione type product was also detected quantitatively from glucobarbarin in foliage of a western genotype (G-type). We suggest that p-hydroxy epiglucobarbarin is initially converted into the conventional oxazolidine-2-thione, which would further rearrange to a thiazolidine-2-one due to the activating effect of the p-hydroxyl group. We conclude that a subtle difference between isomeric phenolic glucosinolates results in significantly different natural hydrolysis products. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据