4.7 Article

Study on characteristics of Ni-W-B composites containing CeO2 nano-particles prepared by pulse electrodeposition

期刊

JOURNAL OF RARE EARTHS
卷 30, 期 1, 页码 43-47

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S1002-0721(10)60636-9

关键词

pulse electrodeposition; composites; characteristics; rare earths

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20806035]
  2. Back-up Personnel Foundation of Academic and Technology Leaders of Yunnan Province [2009CI026]
  3. Key Lab of Advanced Materials in Rare & Precious and Non-ferrous Metals, Ministry of Education [ZDS2010015C]
  4. Yunnan Province Construction Plans of Scientific and Technological Conditions [2010DH025]
  5. Key Laboratory of Inorganic Coating Materials, Shanghai Institute of Ceramics, Chinese Academy of Sciences [KKZ6200927001]
  6. Training Foundation for Talents of Kunming University of Science and Technology [KKZ3200927029]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ni-W-B composites containing CeO2 nano-particles on the surface of 45 steel were prepared by pulse electrodeposition, and the influence of pulse frequency, pulse duty circle and heat treatment temperature on the structures and properties were investigated. The results indicated that the pulse co-deposition of Ni, W, B and CeO2 nano-particles led to Ni-W-B/CeO2 composites possessing higher microhardness and better wear resistance when heat-treated at 400 degrees C for 1 h. The microhardness of 636 HV and the deposition rate of 0.0281 mm/h of the as-deposited alloy were the highest at pulse frequency of 1000 Hz, pulse duty circle of 10% and pulse average current density of 10 A/dm(2). The composites were mainly in the amorphous state and were partially crystallized as-deposited, and the crystallization trend was strengthened when heat-treated at 400 degrees C. Decreasing pulse duty cycle from 75% to 10% was favorable to the refinement in grain structures and improvement of microstructures. The crystal sizes of the composites were smaller by means of pulse electrodeposition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据