4.5 Article

Efficient uranium(VI) biosorption on grapefruit peel: kinetic study and thermodynamic parameters

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10967-011-1602-0

关键词

Biosorption; Grapefruit peel; Uranium (VI); Kinetics; Equilibrium; Mechanisms

资金

  1. Education Department of Henan Province in China [2010A610003]
  2. Henan Science and Technology Department in China [1021 02210103]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The uranium(VI) biosorption by grapefruit peel was studied from aqueous solutions. Batch experiments was conducted to evaluate the effect of contact time, initial uranium(VI) concentration, initial pH, adsorbent dose, salt concentration and temperature. The equilibrium process was well described by the Langmuir, Redlich-Peterson and Koble-Corrigan isotherm models, with maximum sorption capacity of 140.79 mg g(-1) at 298 K. The pseudo second order model and Elovish model adequately describe the kinetic data in comparison to the pseudo first order model and the process involving rate-controlling step is much complex involving both boundary layer and intra-particle diffusion processes. The effective diffusion parameter D-i and D-f values were estimated at different initial concentration and the average values were determined to be 1.167 x 10(-7) and 4.078 x 10(-8) cm(2) s(-1). Thermodynamic parameters showed that the biosorption of uranium(VI) onto grapefruit peel biomass was feasible, spontaneous and endothermic under studied conditions. The physical and chemical properties of the adsorbent were determined by SEM, TG-DSC, XRD and elemental analysis and the nature of biomass-uranium (VI) interactions was evaluated by FTIR analysis, which showed the participation of COOH, OH and NH2 groups in the biosorption process. Adsorbents could be regenerated using 0.05 mol L-1 HCl solution at least three cycles, with up to 80% recovery. Thus, the biomass used in this work proved to be effective materials for the treatment of uranium (VI) bearing aqueous solutions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据