4.3 Article

SirT1 Confers Hypoxia-induced Radioresistance via the Modulation of c-Myc Stabilization on Hepatoma Cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH
卷 53, 期 1, 页码 44-50

出版社

JAPAN RADIATION RESEARCH SOC
DOI: 10.1269/jrr.11062

关键词

Hypoxia; Radioresistance; SirT1; C-Myc; Hepatoma cells

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [31070758, 30770644]
  2. New Teacher Foundation of the Ministry of Education of China [20090071120096]
  3. Shanghai Nature Science Foundation [09ZR1403600, 10ZR1430000]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Intratumoral hypoxia is an important contributory factor to tumor cell resistance to radiotherapy. SirT1, a nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD(+))-dependent histone/protein deacetylase, has been linked to the decrease of radiation-induced DNA damage and seems to be critical for cancer therapy. The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of SirT1 in hypoxia-induced radiation response on hepatoma cells. It was found that the administration with resveratrol, a putative SirT1 activator, enhanced the resistance of HepG2 cells against radiation-induced DNA damage of MN formation under hypoxia condition; while nicotinamide, a well-known SirT1 inhibitor, sensitized this radiation damage. Nevertheless, pretreatment of cells with 10058-F4, a specific inhibitor of c-Myc, almost eliminated the nicotinamide-induced radiosensitive effect. Further studies revealed that resveratrol inhibited c-Myc protein accumulation via up-regulation of SirT1 expression and deacetylase activity, and this loss of c-Myc protein was abolished by inhibiting its degradation in the presence of MG132, a potent inhibitor of proteasome. In contrast, nicotinamide attenuated c-Myc protein degradation induced by radiation under hypoxia through inhibition of SirT1 deacetylase activity. Our findings suggest that SirT1 could serve as a novel potent target of radiation-induced DNA damage and thus as a potential strategy to advance the efficiency of radiation therapy in hepatoma entities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据