4.2 Article

Holocene palaeoceanographic changes in Barrow Strait, Canadian Arctic: foraminiferal evidence

期刊

JOURNAL OF QUATERNARY SCIENCE
卷 25, 期 6, 页码 903-910

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/jqs.1367

关键词

Canadian Arctic; Holocene; benthic foraminifera; carbonate dissolution; sea ice; IP25

资金

  1. Natural Environment Research Council (NERC), UK [NE/D013216/1]
  2. NERC [NE/D013216/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/D013216/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Holocene changes in the benthic and planktic foraminiferal fauna (>63 mu m) from a marine sediment core (ARC-3 Canadian Arctic Archipelago, 74 degrees 16.050' N, 91 degrees 06.380' W, water depth 347 m) show that significant environmental and palaeoceanographic variations occurred during the last 10 ka. Foraminiferal assemblages are restricted to the ca. 4.5-10 ka interval as younger samples are mostly barren of foraminifera due to intense carbonate dissolution after ca. 4.5 ka. Foraminiferal assemblages in the ca. 4.5-10 ka interval are dominated by the benthic species Islandiella helenae and Cassidulina reniforme (57% of total), with Elphidium clavatum, Cibicides lobatulus and Buccella frigida also being common in this interval. The dominance of these species indicates a seasonal sea ice regime which is consistent with the occurrence of the sea ice diatom-derived organic geochemical biomarker IP25 throughout the core. The abundances of C. reniforme and E. clavatum decline upcore; consistent with more frequent mixing of the Barrow Strait water column during the early Holocene. It is likely that the influence of CO2-rich Arctic surface water masses have caused an increase in bottom water corrosivity after ca. 8.5 ka, and dissolution has been further enhanced by sea ice-related processes after ca. 6 ka, concomitant with increased IP25 fluxes. Dissolution is strongest when IP25 fluxes are highest, suggesting a link between the sea ice and benthic systems. Copyright (C) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据