4.6 Article

Smoking patterns in Great Britain: the rise of cheap cigarette brands and roll your own (RYO) tobacco

期刊

JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
卷 37, 期 1, 页码 78-88

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdu048

关键词

tobacco pricing; cheap cigarettes; RYO; Great Britain; inequalities

资金

  1. EC [HEALTH-F2-2009-223323]
  2. Health Foundation Clinician Scientist Fellowship
  3. British Heart Foundation
  4. Cancer Research UK
  5. Economic and Social Research Council
  6. Medical Research Council
  7. National Institute of Health Research under UK Clinical Research Collaboration
  8. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/G007489/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. Medical Research Council [MR/K023195/1, MR/K023195/1B] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In Britain, the tobacco industry segments cigarettes into four price categories-premium, mid-price, economy and ultra-low-price (ULP). Our previous work shows that tobacco companies have kept ULP prices stable in real terms. Roll your own (RYO) tobacco remains cheaper still. Analysis of 2001-08 General Household Survey data to examine trends in use of these cheap products and, using logistic regression, the profile of users of these products. Among smokers, the proportion using cheap products (economy, ULP and RYO combined) increased significantly in almost all age groups and geographic areas. Increases were most marked in under 24 year olds, 76% of whom smoked cheap cigarettes by 2008. All cheap products were more commonly used in lower socio-economic groups. Men and younger smokers were more likely to smoke RYO while women smoked economy brands. Smokers outside London and the South East of England were more likely to smoke some form of cheap tobacco even once socio-economic differences were accounted for. This paper demonstrates that cheap tobacco use is increasing among young and disadvantaged smokers compromising declines in population smoking prevalence. Thus, tobacco industry pricing appears to play a key role in explaining smoking patterns and inequalities in smoking.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据