4.5 Article

Testing a cognitive model of menopausal hot flushes and night sweats

期刊

JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH
卷 74, 期 4, 页码 307-312

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2012.12.005

关键词

Hot flushes; Menopause; Cognitive; Model; Depressed mood; Anxiety

资金

  1. NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London
  2. Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Hot flushes and night sweats (HFNS) are commonly experienced by women during the menopause transition and are particularly problematic for approximately 25% having negative impact on their quality of life. We previously developed a cognitive model of HFNS, which outlines potential predictors of HFNS. This study aims to test the model by investigating the relationships between personality characteristics, perceived stress, mood, HFNS beliefs and subjective and physiological measures of menopausal HFNS. Methods: 140 women (menopause transition or postmenopausal) who were experiencing at least 10 HFNS per week for at least a month, completed assessment interviews, including questionnaires assessing optimism, somatic amplification, perceived stress, depressed mood, anxiety, HFNS beliefs and HFNS frequency, problem-rating and 24-hour sternal skin conductance monitoring. Structural equation models (SEM) were used to investigate the optimum predictive model for HFNS Frequency and HFNS Problem-Rating. Results: On average 63 HFNS per week and moderately problematic HFNS were reported. The physiological measure of HFNS frequency was not associated with socio-demographic variables, personality or mood. The final SEM explained 53.2% of the variance in problem rating. Stress, anxiety and somatic amplification predicted HFNS problem rating but only via their impact on HFNS beliefs; HFNS frequency, smoking and alcohol intake also predicted HFNS problem rating. Conclusions: Findings support the influence of psychological factors on experience of HFNS at the level of symptom perception and cognitive appraisal of HFNS. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据