4.5 Article

Is the Gly82Ser polymorphism in the RAGE gene relevant to schizophrenia and the personality trait psychoticism?

期刊

JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY & NEUROSCIENCE
卷 37, 期 2, 页码 122-128

出版社

CMA-CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1503/jpn.110024

关键词

-

资金

  1. Foundation for Psychosomatic and Clinical Research
  2. Swedish Research Council [K2007-62X-15078-04-3, K2008-62P-20597-01-3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) is the main receptor for S100B, an astrogial proinflammatory mediator that has been suggested to be involved in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. To further elucidate the possible relevance of inflammation for mental functions, we investigated a functional polymorphism in the gene coding for RAGE in relation to personality traits and susceptibility to schizophrenia. Methods: We studied the Gly82Ser polymorphism (rs2070600, 244G>A) in 2 population-based cohorts of middle-aged participants assessed using the Karolinska Scales of Personality. In addition, we compared genotype frequencies between patients with schizophrenia and controls. Results: The population-based cohorts included 270 women and 247 men, and the case control study involved 138 patients with schizophrenia and 258 controls. In the population-based cohorts, 82Ser carriers were found to have significantly higher scores for the psychoticism personality trait comprising the detachment and suspicion subscales. The case control study revealed that the 82Ser allele was significantly more frequent among patients than controls. Limitations: This study was limited by the modest sample size and the use of a self-report measure to assess personality traits. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that the proven relation between certain personality traits and schizophrenia can at least to some extent be explained on a genetic level. Also, the activated S100B RAGE axis may be an underlying cause, not only a consequence, of the disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据