4.5 Article

Large positive effect of lithium on prefrontal cortex N-acetylaspartate in patients with bipolar disorder: 2-centre study

期刊

JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY & NEUROSCIENCE
卷 37, 期 3, 页码 185-192

出版社

CMA-CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1503/jpn.110097

关键词

-

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  2. Nova Scotia Health Research Foundation
  3. Dalhousie Clinical Research Scholarship
  4. The Stanley Medical Research Institute
  5. NARSAD
  6. AstraZeneca
  7. Lilly
  8. Servier
  9. Janssen-Cilag
  10. Lundbeck
  11. BMS/Otsuka
  12. Pfizer
  13. GlaxoSmithKline
  14. Wyeth
  15. BMS
  16. Novartis
  17. Eli Lilly
  18. Canadian Psychiatric Association

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Neuroprotective effects of lithium (Li) have been well documented in tissue cultures and animal models, whereas human data continue to be limited. Previous studies investigating the association between Li treatment and brain N-acetylaspartate (NAA), a putative neuronal marker, showed mixed results because of methodological heterogeneity. Methods: To investigate the effects of Li on prefrontal cortex NAA levels, we compared patients with bipolar disorder from specialized Li clinics in Berlin and Halifax with at least 2 years of ongoing Li treatment (Li group), patients with lifetime Li exposure of less than 3 months more than 2 years ago (non-Li group) and healthy controls. Participants in both patient groups had at least 10 years of illness and 5 episodes. We measured left prefrontal NAA levels using 1.5-T magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Results: We enrolled 27 participants in the Li, 16 in the non-Li and 21 in the healthy control groups. The non-Li group had lower prefrontal NAA levels than the Li group (t(41) = -3.44, corrected p < 0.01) or control participants (t(35) = -2.91, corrected p < 0.05), who did not differ from the Li group (t(46) = -0.14, p = 0.89). The same pattern of prefrontal NAA differences was replicated in both sites. In addition, there was a negative correlation between prefrontal NAA and duration of illness in the non-Li group (r = -0.60, p = 0.019) but not in the Li group (r = 0.07, p = 0.74). Limitations: Study limitations include the cross-sectional design and exposure to other medications. Conclusion: Whereas patients with bipolar disorder, substantial illness burden and limited lifetime Li exposure had significantly lower prefrontal NAA levels than controls, Li-treated patients with similar illness burden showed prefrontal NAA levels comparable to those of healthy controls. These findings provide indirect support for neuroprotective effects of Li and for negative effects of illness burden on prefrontal NAA levels in patients with bipolar disorder.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据