4.6 Article

Clinical, psychological and environmental predictors of prospective suicide events in patients with Bipolar Disorder

期刊

JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH
卷 47, 期 11, 页码 1800-1808

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2013.08.005

关键词

Bipolar; Suicide; Prospective; Predictors; STEP-BD

资金

  1. National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) [N01-MH-80001]
  2. Rubicon Grant [446-11-004]
  3. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO)
  4. Marie Curie Cofund Action

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Patients with Bipolar Disorder (BID) have high rates of suicide compared to the general population. The present study investigates the predictive power of baseline clinical, psychological and environmental characteristics as risk factors of prospective suicide events (attempts and completions). Data was collected from the Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for Bipolar Disorder (STEP-BD) study. 3083 bipolar patients were included in this report, among these 140 (4.6%) had a suicide event (8 died by suicide and 132 attempted suicide). Evaluation and assessment forms were used to collect clinical, psychological and socio-demographic information. Chi-square and independent t-tests were used to evaluate baseline characteristics. Potential prospective predictors were selected on the basis of prior literature and using a screening analysis of all risk factors that were associated with a history of suicide attempt at baseline and were tested using a Cox regression analysis. The strongest predictor of a suicide event was a history of suicide attempt (hazard ratio = 2.60, p-value < 0.001) in line with prior literature. Additional predictors were: younger age, a high total score on the personality disorder questionnaire and a high percentage of days spent depressed in the year prior to study entry. In conclusion, the present findings may help clinicians to identify patients at high risk for suicidal behavior upon presentation for treatment. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据