4.6 Article

State-dependent changes in the expression of DNA methyltransferases in mood disorder patients

期刊

JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH
卷 45, 期 10, 页码 1295-1300

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2011.04.008

关键词

Major depression; Bipolar depression; Leukocyte; Gene expression; Epigenetics; DNA methylation

资金

  1. Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
  2. Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22791127] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aberrant transcriptional regulation may be one of the key components of the pathophysiology of mood disorders. DNA methylation generally acts as an epigenetic gene silencing mechanism and is catalyzed by a group of enzymes known as DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs). Several lines of evidence have suggested aberrant DNA methylation in patients with neuropsychiatric disorders and in animal models for psychiatric disorders. However, the involvement of DNMTs in the pathophysiology of mood disorders is not completely understood. In this study, we aimed to determine whether there are alterations in the expression of DNMTs mRNA in mood disorder patients. We used quantitative real-time PCR to measure the mRNA expression of four DNMT isoforms in the peripheral white blood cells of major depressive disorder (MDD) and bipolar disorder (BPD) patients during a depressive and a remissive episode. We found that the levels of DNMT1 mRNA were significantly decreased in a depressive but not in a remissive state of MDD and BPD. In addition, the levels of DNMT3B mRNA in MDD were significantly increased in a depressive but not in a remissive state. Thus, our data suggest that the altered expression of DNMTs is state dependent and that the aberrant epigenetic gene regulations caused by the altered expression of DNMT1 and DNMT3B may be associated with the pathophysiology of mood disorders. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据