4.5 Article

Transcriptome-facilitated proteomic characterization of rear-fanged snake venoms reveal abundant metalloproteinases with enhanced activity

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROTEOMICS
卷 187, 期 -, 页码 223-234

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2018.08.004

关键词

Venom gland transcriptomics; Shotgun proteomics; Integrated omics; Colubridae venomics; Ahaetulla prasina; Borikenophis portoricensis

资金

  1. School of Biological Sciences, UNC
  2. Major Research Instrumentation grant [MRI-1429003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High-throughput technologies were used to identify venom gland toxin expression and to characterize the venom proteomes of two rear-fanged snakes, Ahaetulla prasina (Asian Green Vine Snake) and Borikenophis portoricensis (Puerto Rican Racer). Sixty-nine complete toxin-coding transcripts from 12 venom protein superfamilies (A. prasina) and 50 complete coding transcripts from 11 venom protein superfamilies (B. portoricensis) were identified in the venom glands. However, only 18% (A. prasina) and 32% (B. portoricensis) of the translated protein isoforms were detected in the proteome of these venoms. Both venom gland transcriptomes and venom proteomes were dominated by P-III metalloproteinases. Three-finger toxins, cysteine-rich secretory proteins, and C-type lectins were present in moderate amounts, but other protein superfamilies showed very low abundances. Venoms contained metalloproteinase activity comparable to viperid snake venom levels, but other common venom enzymes were absent or present at negligible levels. Western blot analysis showed metalloproteinase and cysteine-rich secretory protein epitopes shared with the highly venomous Boomslang (Dispholidus typus). The abundance of metalloproteinases emphasizes the important trophic role of these toxins. Comprehensive, transcriptome-informed definition of proteomes and functional characterization of venom proteins in rear-fanged snake families help to elucidate toxin evolution and provide models for protein structure-function analyses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据