4.5 Article

Two-dimensional liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry coupled with isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantification (iTRAQ) labeling approach revealed first proteome profiles of pulmonary alveolar macrophages infected with porcine circovirus type 2

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROTEOMICS
卷 79, 期 -, 页码 72-86

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2012.11.024

关键词

Porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2); Porcine alveolar macrophages (PAMs); Cellular proteins; Change; iTRAQ

资金

  1. Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest [201203039, 201003060-4]
  2. Jiangsu Province Science and Technology Support Program [BE2012368]
  3. China agricultural research system foundation [CARS-36]
  4. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) has been identified as the essential causal agent of postweaning multisystemic wasting syndrome, which has spread worldwide. Monocyte/macrophage lineage cells are the major target cells of PCV2. To discover cellular protein responses of pulmonary alveolar macrophages (PAMs) to PCV2 infection, two-dimensional liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry coupled with isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantification (iTRAQ) labeling was employed to quantitatively identify the proteins that were differentially expressed in PAMs from the PCV2-infected group compared to the uninfected control group. A total of 145 cellular proteins in PAMs that were significantly altered at different time periods post-infection were identified. These differentially expressed proteins were related to the biological processes of binding, cell structure, signal transduction, cell adhesion, etc., and their interactions. The high number of differentially expressed proteins identified should be very useful to elucidate the mechanism of replication and pathogenesis of PCV2 in the future. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据