4.5 Article

A combined de novo protein sequencing and cDNA library approach to the venomic analysis of Chinese spider Araneus ventricosus

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROTEOMICS
卷 78, 期 -, 页码 416-427

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2012.10.011

关键词

Araneus ventricosus; Venom; Venomic analysis; De novo sequencing; cDNA library; Mass spectrometry

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2010CB529801]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30901874]
  3. Scientific Research Fund of Hunan Normal University [090640]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In past years, spider venoms have attracted increasing attention due to their extraordinary chemical and pharmacological diversity. The recently popularized proteomic method highly improved our ability to analyze the proteins in the venom. However, the lack of information about isolated venom proteins sequences dramatically limits the ability to confidently identify venom proteins. In the present paper, the venom from Araneus ventricosus was analyzed using two complementary approaches: 2-DE/Shotgun-LC-MS/MS coupled to MASCOT search and 2-DE/Shotgun-LC-MS/MS coupled to manual de novo sequencing followed by local venom protein database (LVPD) search. The LVPD was constructed with toxin-like protein sequences obtained from the analysis of cDNA library from A. ventricosus venom glands. Our results indicate that a total of 130 toxin-like protein sequences were unambiguously identified by manual de novo sequencing coupled to LVPD search, accounting for 86.67% of all toxin-like proteins in LVPD. Thus manual de novo sequencing coupled to LVPD search was proved an extremely effective approach for the analysis of venom proteins. In addition, the approach displays impeccable advantage in validating mutant positions of isoforms from the same toxin-like family. Intriguingly, methyl esterifcation of glutamic acid was discovered for the first time in animal venom proteins by manual de novo sequencing. Crown Copyright (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据